Large Language Models and Artificial Intelligence for Police Report Writing
·
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, are advanced artificial intelligence systems capable of understanding and generating human-like text. They are trained on vast amounts of textual data, enabling them to comprehend context, answer questions, generate summaries, and even engage in meaningful conversations. As these models continue to evolve, their potential applications in various industries, including law enforcement, are becoming more apparent, as are the potential threats. One particularly promising area of application for LLMs in policing is report writing. As many police executives know, not all officers possess strong writing skills, which can lead to inaccurate or incomplete reports. This can have serious consequences for criminal prosecutions, as well as expose departments to civil liability concerns. Implementing LLMs like ChatGPT for report-writing assistance may help address these issues. Even if not fully implemented at the agency level, officers across the country are already using these tools to help in their report generation. Given the stakes, it is wise for agencies to have a sophisticated view and policy on these tools. This paper introduces practitioners to LLMs for report writing, considers the implications of using such tools, and suggests a template-based approach to deploying the technology to patrol officers.
Introduction
Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, are advanced artificial intelligence1 systems capable of understanding and generating human-like text. They are trained on vast amounts of textual data, enabling them to comprehend context, answer questions, generate summaries, and even engage in meaningful conversations. As these models continue to evolve, their potential applications in various industries, including law enforcement, are becoming more apparent, as are the potential threats.
One particularly promising area of application for LLMs in policing is report writing. As many police executives know, not all officers possess strong writing skills, which can lead to inaccurate or incomplete reports. This can have serious consequences for criminal prosecutions, as well as expose departments to civil liability concerns. Implementing LLMs like ChatGPT for report-writing assistance may help address these issues. Even if not fully implemented at the agency level, officers across the country are already using these tools to help in their report generation.2 Given the stakes, it is wise for agencies to have a sophisticated view and policy on these tools.
First, using LLMs for report writing can lead to increased efficiency. By providing officers with an AI-driven tool that helps them draft accurate and comprehensive reports more quickly, departments can save valuable time and resources, especially during staffing crises. Officers can then allocate more of their attention to their core duties, ultimately improving public safety and departmental productivity.
Second, the use of LLMs can lead to better-quality reports, which can positively impact criminal investigations and prosecutions. Clear, concise, and accurate police reports are crucial for presenting evidence, establishing probable cause, and ensuring that cases proceed smoothly through the criminal justice system. By reducing the likelihood of errors, omissions, or inconsistencies, LLMs can help strengthen cases and contribute to more successful outcomes. Furthermore, these benefits could consistently extend across the agency’s reporting outputs.
Finally, improved report writing can also help mitigate civil liability concerns. Poorly written or incomplete reports can increase the risk of lawsuits and damage the reputation of a department. By using LLMs to create more accurate and consistent reports, departments can reduce the likelihood of legal challenges and demonstrate their commitment to professionalism and accountability. However, in the absence of clear agency guidance, these same tools can increase both personal and agency liability.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technology, LLM tools like ChatGPT are not just fleeting innovations; they are indicative of a transformative shift in the way we approach tasks and solve problems. Drawing a parallel from the past, consider the evolution from the rudimentary department-issued pager to today's sophisticated smartphones. Upon the initial introduction of pagers, few could have anticipated the multifaceted functionalities of modern smartphones—from real-time mapping to a myriad of communication platforms. Similarly, few predicted challenges like sexting or the emergence of burner phones. Yet, with each technological leap, society adapted, incorporating these tools into daily life and adjusting to their implications, both positive and negative.
In the same vein, the adoption of LLMs in policing and report-writing can be likened to this technological progression. The aim isn't merely to adopt but to harness these tools effectively, with foresight and wisdom. While LLMs hold the promise of revolutionizing report generation, ensuring accuracy, and streamlining processes, they also come with their own set of challenges and considerations. It is, therefore, incumbent upon law enforcement agencies to be proactive, developing an informed and strategic perspective on these tools. By doing so, departments can strike a balance between leveraging the benefits of AI-driven assistance and mitigating potential pitfalls, ensuring they remain at the forefront of both technological innovation and public safety best practices.
Update January 14, 2024:
In light of these advancements and applications, it is noteworthy that OpenAI has recently introduced organization accounts, offering expanded capabilities and features tailored to institutional needs. This development presents a significant opportunity for law enforcement agencies, including those led by police chiefs and sheriffs, to consider adopting larger ChatGPT accounts for enhanced implementation of these AI tools. The availability of organization accounts allows for a more integrated and comprehensive use of LLMs like ChatGPT in police departments. This could facilitate broader and more efficient deployment of AI-assisted report writing, contributing to improved accuracy, consistency, and time-efficiency in documentation processes. Moreover, the adoption of such accounts can be seen as a strategic move towards embracing technological advancements, aligning law enforcement practices with the evolving digital landscape.
Further, ChatGPT Enterprise addresses concerns about sensitive data by offering enterprise-grade privacy and security features. Specifically, it ensures that customer data and conversations are not used for training OpenAI models. The platform is also SOC 2 compliant, and all conversations are encrypted both in transit and at rest. These features are designed to protect sensitive information, making it a viable option for organizations like law enforcement agencies that handle confidential data. For more details, you can refer to OpenAI's ChatGPT Enterprise announcement.
Update January 28, 2024:
A noteworthy advancement in the realm of AI-assisted law enforcement report writing is the introduction of the Truleo Narrative program. This innovative system streamlines the report-writing process by allowing officers to call a designated number, enter a personal PIN, and verbally relay the details of an incident via voicemail. Behind the scenes, Truleo Narrative employs a version of ChatGPT to transform these voicemails into well-structured, grammatically sound initial reports. Officers can subsequently access these drafts on the Truleo Narrative platform, where they can review, edit, and then copy and paste the content for official use. Importantly, the platform ensures officers verify the accuracy of the narrative before allowing its finalization, which is crucial for legal documentation and accountability. This product also is secured with GovCloud (via AWS), thereby addressing some of the obvious security concerns detailed later. This method offers a more immediate and interactive approach to report generation compared to traditional methods. For a detailed comparison of this modern approach with a more conventional method, the reader is directed to a later section of this paper, which delves into the 'Recorded Line Protocol' and its comparative analysis with GPT-assisted reporting systems.
Using LLMs to Generate a Report
To use ChatGPT for report writing assistance, an officer would typically follow these steps:
Access ChatGPT-4 interface: The officer would access a ChatGPT Pro interface3, which could be available as a web application, mobile app, or (in the future) integrated into an existing report writing system used by the department. The interface should be user-friendly and secure, ensuring data privacy and compliance with law enforcement regulations.
Select template: The officer would choose the appropriate pre-formatted template for the type of incident they are reporting. These templates would have clearly defined sections or "buckets" for specific information, such as incident details, involved parties, evidence, and narrative.
Fill out basic details: The officer would begin by entering basic information into the corresponding fields in the template. This helps set the context for ChatGPT and ensures that the report's structure is maintained.
Request AI assistance: For more complex or detailed sections of the report, such as the narrative, the officer could request assistance from ChatGPT. Based on the information already provided in the template and any additional context given by the officer, ChatGPT would generate content tailored to fit the template's structure.
Review and edit AI-generated content: The officer would review the AI-generated content, making any necessary edits or revisions to ensure accuracy and clarity. If needed, the officer could request additional input from ChatGPT to refine specific sections or address any concerns.
Combine template and AI-generated narrative: Once the officer is satisfied with the generated content, they would incorporate the AI-generated narrative into the report alongside the original completed template. This ensures a comprehensive and structured documentation of the incident.
Finalize and submit the report: The officer would review the entire report, including both the template and narrative sections, making any last-minute adjustments as needed. They would then finalize the report and submit it according to their department's procedures.
Continuous improvement: Departments using ChatGPT for report writing assistance should regularly monitor and evaluate the AI's performance. Feedback from officers can be used to improve the system, ensuring it becomes increasingly useful and efficient over time.
By following these steps, an officer can leverage ChatGPT's language capabilities to draft more accurate, clear, and consistent police reports, while also saving time and improving overall efficiency.
Report Submission
Including both the original completed template and the GPT-generated narrative (once edited and finalized by the officer) in the final report provides a comprehensive documentation of the incident. This approach would ensure that all relevant information is covered and organized in a clear, structured manner, making it easier for other officers, investigators, and prosecutors to review and understand the case details.
Including both formats in the final report also allows for the benefits of the structured template (easy reference and organization) and the narrative form (providing context and a more detailed account of the incident). This combination can contribute to a more effective and efficient investigation process.
Ensuring Trustworthiness in AI-Generated Outputs
While the advancements in language models like ChatGPT have been significant, it's crucial to approach their use with discernment, especially in critical areas like police reporting. Earlier versions, such as ChatGPT 3.5, despite their then-innovative capabilities, could produce outputs that lacked consistency and accuracy.
Simply put, relying on free or older versions of ChatGPT for critical tasks like police reports can be a risky proposition. For a task of such magnitude, it's imperative to employ the latest versions, like ChatGPT-4 or later, which have seen substantial improvements in reliability.
However, even with the most advanced versions, human oversight remains essential. While ChatGPT-4 can expedite the report-writing process, it should complement, not replace, the expertise of trained professionals. Departments should emphasize regular review, validation, and feedback to ensure the trustworthiness of AI-assisted reports. In essence, for optimal results and trustworthiness, rely on the latest ChatGPT versions under vigilant human supervision.
Scope of Current Template Application
The template showcased in this white paper is specifically tailored for "simple theft" reports. While it serves as an illustrative example of how ChatGPT can be employed to streamline the report-writing process for certain types of incidents, it's essential for agencies to recognize its current limitations.
For a comprehensive integration of AI-driven reporting across various incident types, agencies would need to embark on a meticulous process of template generation and validation. Each incident type – from minor traffic violations to major felonies – possesses its unique complexities and nuances. Creating and refining templates that address these nuances is crucial.
It's worth noting that, at present, especially complex or multifaceted incident types might prove challenging for the current AI-template methodology. While the latest versions of ChatGPT offer impressive language capabilities, certain intricate scenarios might demand human expertise beyond the support of a language model.
Agencies should therefore approach the integration of ChatGPT-aided report writing with an experimental mindset. Starting with simpler report types, gradually iterating and refining, and cautiously venturing into more complex domains ensures a balanced and effective use of technology without compromising the accuracy and detail that are pivotal in law enforcement reporting.
Recorded Line Protocol Comparison
The recorded line protocol is a method used by some law enforcement agencies to facilitate report writing. In this process, patrol officers call a central recorded line at the end of a call and provide a plain language summary of the incident, covering relevant details similar to the "buckets" found in the templates we discussed earlier. A few days later, front-office staff listen to the recorded line, transcribe the officer's summary, and draft the report. Once the report is written, it is sent back to the officer for review and signature, indicating that the officer has verified the report's accuracy based on their memory of the incident.
Comparing Recorded Line Protocol with GPT-Assisted Reports
Similarities:
Both methods involve the officer providing an initial summary of the incident, whether through a recorded line or by filling out a template.
In both cases, an external resource (front-office staff or ChatGPT) assists in drafting the report based on the officer's input.
The officer reviews and approves the final report in both scenarios, ensuring accuracy and accountability.
Differences:
The recorded line protocol relies on human transcription and report drafting, whereas GPT-assisted reports leverage AI technology to generate content.
With the recorded line protocol, there may be a delay of a few days before the report is drafted, while GPT-assisted reports can be generated more quickly, sometimes within minutes.
GPT-assisted reports allow officers to request specific guidance, revisions, or alternative suggestions for report content, whereas the recorded line protocol may not provide the same level of interactive feedback.
Comparative Advantages:
GPT-assisted reports have the potential to be more efficient, as AI can generate content quickly, reducing the time between incident response and report completion.
The interactive nature of GPT-assisted reports may result in more accurate and comprehensive reports, as officers can collaborate with the AI to address specific concerns or gaps in the content.
GPT-assisted reports may alleviate some workload from front-office staff, freeing them up for other tasks and potentially reducing costs for the department.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the recorded line protocol has the advantage of human judgment and understanding of context, which may not always be present in AI-generated content. Departments must weigh the benefits and limitations of each method to determine the most suitable approach for their needs.
Template Example (Empty): Simple Theft
IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THIS TEMPLATE:
Fill out each section of this template with the relevant information from the incident you are reporting. If a section is not applicable, leave it blank. Once your assisted draft is complete, copy the entire prompt and template to the end of your final report.
This prompt should only be used with ChatGPT 4.0 (or later) – using the free 3.5 version is highly likely to introduce errors.
Before using ChatGPT to help you draft the report, copy and paste the provided prompt at the beginning of your filled template:4
"Dear ChatGPT, I am a police officer seeking your expertise in generating a narrative for a police report, based on a filled-out template I will provide following these instructions:
Voice and Perspective: Generate the narrative in the first-person voice and in past-tense action. Incorporate my name and badge number from the template for authenticity.
Accuracy and Clarity: Your narrative should strictly adhere to the facts provided in the template. Do not introduce new facts, speculation, or interpretations. Use plain, straightforward language that is easily understood.
Objectivity and Neutrality: Maintain a high level of objectivity. Use balanced and impartial language, avoiding any form of personal bias, assumptions, or opinions.
Comprehensiveness: Should you identify gaps in the template where crucial information appears to be missing, indicate these but do not fill them in with information not provided.
Narrative Form: Your output should be a coherent narrative. Do not simply recite the facts in a bulleted or segmented manner.
No Conclusions: Refrain from adding a conclusion paragraph, as this could skew the impartiality of the report.
Strict adherence to these guidelines is essential for the credibility and legal standing of this report. Thank you for your assistance in maintaining these high standards."
Submit your filled template with the prompt to ChatGPT. Review the AI-generated content carefully, making any necessary edits or revisions to ensure accuracy, clarity, impartiality, and completeness.
REMEMBER: YOU, the officer, are ultimately responsible for any report you sign. ChatGPT and other LLMs are ONLY here to help draft reports, and they CANNOT be the final author of any report. It is your duty to review, edit, and finalize the report before submitting it according to your department's procedures.
Reporting Officer:
Name:
Badge:
Assignment:
Incident Details
Date of Incident:
Time of Incident:
Location of Incident (address or GPS coordinates):
Type of Property (e.g., retail store, residence, vehicle, etc.):
Victim Information:
Name:
Date of Birth:
Address:
Contact Number:
Relationship to Victim/Property (if applicable):
(enter additional victim(s) information if applicable):
Case Status (open, pending further information, referred to detectives, etc.):
Arrest Information (if applicable)
Arresting Officer(s):
Date and Time of Arrest:
Location of Arrest:
Charges Filed:
Booking Information (booking number, jail facility, etc.):
Additional Details (e.g., use of force, injuries, statements made by the suspect):
Example Final Report – Completed Narrative & Template
Dear ChatGPT, you are an expert police report writing assistant. I am a police officer who has taken a report, and entered information into a template to help you assist me in writing a narrative report from that completed template.
As I provide you with the filled-out Simple Theft Report Template, please help me create a narrative report in the first-person, past action voice of the reporting officer, using their name and badge number from the template. Prioritize accuracy and clarity above all else, ensuring the information is precise and easy to understand. Use plain language whenever possible to make the report accessible and comprehensible to all readers.
Remember to use balanced, impartial language that avoids any personal biases, assumptions, or opinions. Maintain objectivity and neutrality throughout the report to ensure fairness and credibility in the investigation process. Also, please identify any gaps in the report where important information may be missing, as a comprehensive and complete report is essential for a thorough investigation.
Do not provide a conclusion paragraph. Your assistance in maintaining the highest standards of accuracy, clarity, impartiality, and completeness is greatly appreciated.
REPORT TYPE: SIMPLE THEFT
Reporting Officer:
Name: Ian Rogers
Badge: USC114
Assignment: Patrol, afternoons
Incident Details
Date of Incident: 4/28/2023
Time of Incident: after 10pm last night, discovered at 8:30am today
Location of Incident (address or GPS coordinates): 348 Kincade Street, Columbia, SC 29205
Type of Property (e.g., retail store, residence, vehicle, etc.): camera
Victim Information:
Name: Rick Roll
Date of Birth: 1/14/1987
Address: same as incident
Contact Number: 801-867-5309
Relationship to Victim/Property (if applicable): owner
(enter additional victim(s) information if applicable): none known
Suspect Information:
Suspect #1
Name or Alias (if known): unknown
Description (gender, race, age, height, weight, clothing, etc.): white, 6’0, 200lbs, black shirt, red shorts, yellow adidas
Vehicle Information (make, model, color, license plate, etc.): none, was on a bike
Who provided suspect information? Rick
Additional suspect(s), if applicable (repeat steps 1-3 for each suspect): none known
Stolen Property
Item(s) Stolen:
Description (include make, model, color, serial number, etc.): Nikon CX7800
Estimated Value: $1500
Any distinguishing marks or features: scratch on lens cap (owners name), SN #EUY5634K8
Additional item(s), if applicable (repeat steps 1-3 for each item): none
Evidence Collected
Type of Evidence (e.g., photographs, fingerprints, DNA samples, etc.): none taken
Description and Location of Evidence (where it was found or collected):
Chain of Custody (e.g., officer who collected the evidence, evidence technician):
Additional evidence, if applicable (repeat steps 1-3 for each piece of evidence):
Narrative
Summary of Incident:
Describe how the theft occurred (method of entry, time frame, etc.): owner left vehicle unlocked last night, when he got up he noticed the camera he’d left in the car last night done got broken into
Detail any possible witnesses or surveillance footage available: neighbor has a Nest camera, but wasn’t home when I knocked, so unknown if it captured theft
Include any additional information relevant to the investigation: this is related to other burglaries in the area that I have investigated, and this could be “Baseball Bob” up to no good. I arrested him previously for similar vehicle burgs a month ago (see case ending -14567).
Officer Observations (if applicable):
Describe the scene upon arrival (signs of forced entry, evidence, etc.): car unlocked, no damage to car, but belongings all over like they’d been rifled through. There was a business card labeled “Baseball Bob Wuz Here”
Document any initial statements or observations made by involved parties: Reporting party said it definitely smelled bad in her car this morning, like human body odor
Actions Taken
Initial Response (e.g., area search, evidence collection, witness interviews): did not take any evidence in this case, unknown suspect
Follow-up Actions (e.g., contacting pawn shops, reviewing surveillance footage): entered SN for stolen property into PawnWatch database
Case Status (open, pending further information, referred to detectives, etc.): open, unknown suspect, will require detective follow-up
Arrest Information (if applicable)
Arresting Officer(s): no arrest was made.
Date and Time of Arrest:
Location of Arrest:
Charges Filed:
Booking Information (booking number, jail facility, etc.):
Additional Details (e.g., use of force, injuries, statements made by the suspect):
Example Final Report Output:
Using the instructions and partially completed template above, the following narrative was generated (using ChatGPT-4 on Feb. 26, 2024):
On April 28, 2023, I, Officer Ian Rogers, badge number USC114, assigned to patrol duties during the afternoon shift, was dispatched to 348 Kincade Street, Columbia, SC 29205, in response to a reported theft. The incident was reported to have occurred after 10 pm the previous night and was discovered at approximately 8:30 am on the day of the report.
Upon arrival at the scene, I met with the victim, Rick Roll, who resides at the same address. Mr. Roll reported that he had left his vehicle unlocked overnight and upon returning to it in the morning, discovered that his camera, a Nikon CX7800 valued at approximately $1,500, was missing. The camera was noted to have a scratch on the lens cap along with the owner's name and a serial number EUY5634K8, which could serve as distinguishing marks for identification. Mr. Roll provided a description of a suspect observed in the vicinity, described as a white male, approximately 6’0 tall, weighing around 200lbs, wearing a black shirt, red shorts, and yellow Adidas shoes. The suspect was last seen on a bicycle, with this information being directly provided by Mr. Roll.
I noted that there were no signs of forced entry to the vehicle, indicating that the theft occurred due to the vehicle being left unlocked. Inside the vehicle, belongings appeared to have been rifled through, and a business card with the inscription “Baseball Bob Wuz Here” was discovered, suggesting a potential lead or suspect. Mr. Roll also mentioned that the interior of the car had a distinct odor of human body odor upon his discovery of the theft.
The neighborhood is known to have several residences equipped with surveillance systems, including a neighbor with a Nest camera. However, at the time of my visit, the neighbor was not available to confirm if the theft was captured on their surveillance system. This incident appears to be connected to a series of burglaries in the area, potentially involving an individual known as “Baseball Bob,” whom I have previously arrested for similar crimes.
As part of the initial response, I did not collect physical evidence at the scene due to the nature of the theft and the lack of immediate suspects. The stolen property’s serial number was entered into the PawnWatch database as a follow-up action to aid in recovery efforts. The case remains open with no suspects currently identified, necessitating further investigation and detective follow-up.
No arrests have been made in connection with this incident. The case status is currently open, with an unknown suspect. Further actions will include reviewing surveillance footage, if available, and coordinating with detectives for a more thorough investigation.
Figure 1: Example Officer Using ChatGPT for Report Writing
Figure 1: Example Officer Post Using ChatGPT for Report Writing (Reddit r/LEO, May 6, 2023)
Appendix (or, still to do)
In this appendix, I lay out very short considerations for continuing work in this area. The evolving nature of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT presents an ongoing opportunity to enhance report writing efficiency and quality within law enforcement agencies. Since the initial drafts of this document, advancements in model accuracy, data privacy features, or user interface improvements have emerged, and will continue to do so. Furthermore, real-world implementations or pilot projects within law enforcement or similar sectors could provide practical insights. It's crucial to stay updated on these developments to better understand the practical and effective application of LLMs in police report writing.
Ethical Considerations
The deployment of AI in policing entails significant ethical considerations. Key among these are data privacy, bias mitigation, and the ramifications of automated decision-making. The potential for misuse or over-reliance on AI tools underscores the importance of human oversight. Addressing these ethical dimensions is paramount to fostering responsible AI deployment in policing, ensuring the trust and confidence of both law enforcement personnel and the communities they serve.
Technological Infrastructure
A robust technological infrastructure is fundamental for the successful deployment of LLMs within police departments. This includes the necessary cybersecurity measures to safeguard sensitive data, and the technical requirements to support AI-driven report writing systems. Understanding these technical dimensions will provide a clearer roadmap for secure and effective implementation, ensuring the integrity and reliability of the system.
Training and Adaptation
The integration of LLMs into the policing workflow necessitates structured training programs to ensure seamless adaptation by officers and administrative personnel. Establishing feedback loops for continuous improvement based on user interaction and feedback is crucial. A pragmatic approach towards training and adaptation can foster a positive human-machine synergy, optimizing the benefits of LLMs in report writing.
Legal and Regulatory Framework
The legal and regulatory landscape governing AI deployment in law enforcement is a critical aspect of this discourse. It's essential to explore the policy frameworks that could be adopted at the agency level to govern the use of LLMs in report writing. Understanding the legal and regulatory requirements will ensure compliance, mitigating risks associated with the use of AI technologies in a law enforcement setting.
Evaluation Metrics
Proposing metrics or benchmarks to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of LLMs in assisting with report writing is crucial. A systematic review process to ensure the quality and accuracy of AI-assisted reports is integral for maintaining a high standard of reporting. Continuous evaluation will also provide valuable insights for improving the system over time, ensuring it meets the evolving needs of law enforcement agencies.
Interdepartmental Collaboration
Interdepartmental collaboration can be a potent catalyst for sharing best practices, training resources, and technological infrastructure. Exploring existing collaborative initiatives or proposing new frameworks for inter-agency cooperation can significantly expedite the learning curve and implementation process, fostering a conducive environment for the successful deployment of LLMs in report writing.
Community Engagement
Community engagement and transparency are vital when deploying AI tools in policing. Strategies for educating the public and gaining their trust in the use of these technologies are essential. Transparent communication about the benefits and limitations of AI-assisted report writing can contribute to building a positive rapport between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve. Recent research from my team has found the public trusts local law enforcement to use AI across both external (crime control) and internal (disciplinary control) context.
Future Implications
The long-term implications and potential evolution of AI-assisted report writing in policing need consideration. Exploring how LLMs could contribute to broader organizational efficiency and public safety objectives is essential. Understanding the future trajectory of this technology can aid in strategic planning, ensuring law enforcement agencies are well-positioned to leverage emerging opportunities.
Resources
A section for further reading, providing references to recent research papers, case studies, and reputable sources discussing the use of LLMs in law enforcement or related fields is beneficial. This will offer readers a pathway to delve deeper into the subject matter, enhancing their understanding and appreciation of the potential impact of LLMs on policing practices.
Technical Specifications
Detailing the technical specifications and requirements for deploying ChatGPT or similar LLMs is important for readers seeking a deeper technical understanding. Providing this information in an appendix can offer a comprehensive insight into the technical underpinnings necessary for successful deployment, without overwhelming readers uninterested in technical details.
International Perspectives
The landscape of artificial intelligence in law enforcement isn't confined to domestic advancements; it's a global endeavor with varying approaches across different jurisdictions. As such, examining international perspectives can provide a more rounded understanding of the potential and challenges associated with implementing Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT in report writing. For instance, certain European nations may have embarked on pilot projects integrating AI in police operations, shedding light on practical and regulatory hurdles and how they were navigated. Similarly, exploring how different legal and cultural frameworks influence the adoption and governance of AI in policing internationally can inform a more nuanced approach domestically.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Understanding the financial implications is pivotal for any police department considering the adoption of LLMs for report writing. Conducting a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis can elucidate the initial investment required for technology acquisition, training, and infrastructure upgrade, juxtaposed against the potential savings in terms of time and resources, and the qualitative benefits of improved report accuracy and consistency. Such an analysis can provide a clear financial blueprint, aiding executives in making informed decisions on the viability and long-term sustainability of implementing LLMs in their report writing processes. This pragmatic financial insight is indispensable for planning and justifying the allocation of resources towards integrating LLMs like ChatGPT in the report writing framework.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)
