A preliminary schedule for phasing-out knife crime
·
Abstract
Knife crime has become a prominent and seemingly intractable problem in England & Wales. Theory and evidence indicates that reducing crime opportunities is an effective means of crime control, including restrictions on lethal weapons. While public debate has centred on zombie and other ‘status’ knives, the most prevalent homicide weapon is a kitchen knife. Here we argue that replacing pointed kitchen knives with round-end knives would reduce knife crime with little or no displacement, and may reduce other forms of violence. Drawing on the approach to remove fossil-fuel vehicles from roads, we propose a phased removal of lethal kitchen knives and estimate this will cut knife crime in half.
INTRODUCTION
On Monday 29 July 2024, BBC news reported that:
“Three young girls have been killed in a "ferocious" knife attack in Southport at a Taylor Swift-themed dance and yoga event…. Eight more children were injured, with five leftin a critical condition,after the incidentlate on Monday morning. Two adults also suffered critical injuries,Merseyside Police said.
Armed officers detained a male and seized a knife, with police later saying that a 17-year-old boy had been arrested on suspicion of murder and attempted murder. The attack is not being treated as terror-related, police said.” (Culley and Khalil 2024).
This tragedy furthered mounting perception that knife crime in England & Wales was out of control. In the year ending March 2023 there were close to 50,000 knife crimes recorded by police, and knives were the most popular weapon used in homicide (reviewed further below with other evidence). Faced with a series of high-profile incidents, the government sought to strengthen existing restrictions on carrying zombie knives and machetes with a proposal to ban sales (Nevett 2024). This complements policy and practice to reduce knife crime including police operations and legal measures such as the 2019 Offensive Weapons Act.
Policy and practice to address knife crime in England and Wales has recently been reviewed elsewhere (Bullock et al. 2023, Sidebottom et al. 2021), and we give only a brief recap here. The 2019 Offensive Weapons Act made it illegal to possess dangerous weapons in private rather than solely in public as previously. It introduced Knife Crime Prevention Orders which are court orders that require an individual to desist from activities that might involve violence. In the context of the present study, the 2019 Act is important because it classified kitchen knives as an offensive weapon, setting a legislative precedent and reference point for what follows.
Major recent police operations have targeted knife crime (Bullock et al. 2023), and a review assessed eight types of police response (Sidebottom et al. 2021). The four responses aiming to reduce knife crime were: school-based interventions, police stop and search, focused deterrence, and import enforcement. The four responses aiming to reduce knife carrying were: knife sweeps, knife bins, knife arches (metal detectors), and ‘teachable moments’ (Sidebottom et al. 2021). The study concluded that relatively little is known about what works. While there is extensive support among police for knife-crime interventions, effective problem-solving efforts have proved difficult to develop (Bullock et al. 2023).
A public health approach underpins the introduction of Violence Reduction Units (VRUs) in the 18 police force areas with the highest rates of hospital admissions for knife crime injuries (Home Office 2022, 2024). The VRUs promote multi-agency approaches, data sharing, seek to engage young people, and commission evidence-based interventions. To date there has been limited evaluation and it has not been possible to attribute change in knife crime to VRU activities.
Efforts have been made to reduce the availability of status knives. A voluntary agreement with major retailers has been in place since 2016 and was extended in 2024 (Home Office 2024). This has sought to restrict in-person and online sales of dangerous knives to customers aged under 18 using age verification checks similar to those for alcohol sales. The think 21’ or ‘think 25’ approach encourages retailers to ask for proof of age from customers who may be under-age, implemented via staff training. Retailers are also required to ensure that knives are securely displayed and packaged to minimise risk including theft. Some online retailers including eBAy restrict the sale of all knives except cutlery. Others such as Amazon require age verification on delivery (Home Office 2024), though the present authors are unclear on whether or how this is enforced.
Overall, then, the repertoire of policy and practice known to be effective against knife crime is limited. Here we suggest a change of emphasis. The theoretical and evidential platform for the study is outlined first. It shows that reducing crime opportunities is an effective means of reducing crime, including control of lethal weaponry. We then examine evidence that the most popular homicide weapon is a knife, and that – contrary to the orientation of much of the public debate – the most prevalent knife in homicide is a lethal pointed-tip kitchen knife. We follow this with research evidence that, perhaps not surprisingly, pointed-tip knives are more harmful than round-tip knives. This is the foundation for our proposal to phase-out lethal pointed-tip knives, particularly kitchen knives, for which round-tip knives can be substituted. We address the potential criticism that crime will displace to other weapons and explain why it is unlikely to occur to any great extent. The schedule we propose draws on that for fossil-fuelled vehicles, involving consultation plus periods to allow knife manufacturers and customers to adapt.
We use the definition of knife crime adopted by the Office for National Statistics and used in a recent House of Commons briefing on knife crime (Allen et al. 2023). Knife crime is defined as any crime involving a knife or sharp instrument. This includes assaults and threats with knives but also other crimes where a knife or sharp instrument may have been involved. This may include but is not limited to some theft and robbery, sexual assaults, and other crimes. We clarify any more specific use of the term as we progress. Note also that we discuss pointed-tip knives and round-tip knives but sometimes refer to these as lethal and non-lethal kitchen knives respectively, because the latter terms more accurately capture the essence of the problem.
Reducing crime opportunities in theory and practice
This study is framed in terms of crime opportunity theory. A crime opportunity is any situation in which the perceived benefits of committing a crime outweigh the perceived costs. Decisions are subjective, which means there are situations where one person perceives a crime opportunity where another does not. Decisions are also context dependant. Hence whether a kitchen knife is viewed as a potential weapon depends on the individual (their capabilities, experiences and so on) and on whether it is Sunday dinner or a Saturday night alcohol-fuelled domestic argument.
The central theoretical elements are routine activities, rational choice and situational crime prevention (Cohen & Felson 1979, Clarke & Cornish 1985, Clarke 2018). The routine activity theory observes that a crime occurs upon the convergence in time and space of a potential offender and a suitable target in the absence of capable guardianship. Offenders make decisions in pursuit of a goal, based on existing knowledge, experience and information. This means that poorly-informed, poorly-made and other seemingly ‘irrational’ decisions are still decisions made within the same cost-benefit framework. The theory distinguishes decisions relating to initial involvement in crime (often by adolescents), from decisions to continue committing crime (leading to habitual offending), and decisions relating to desistence. For example, few young people carry weapons before they have become involved in crime, and weapon-carrying increases over time. The theory parses individual criminal events into decision sequences known as scripts (Cornish 1994, Dehghanniri & Borrion 2021, Leclerc 2016). Different knife crimes have different scripts, but all involve similar stages of decisions relating to preparation and pre-conditions, selecting and approaching a target, committing the crime, and the aftermath which may be escaping from the scene.
Situational crime prevention aims to reduce or block crime opportunities to reduce crime or its harms. Reducing crime opportunities shifts offenders’ decisions away from crime. For example, efforts to remove dangerous knives from circulation, whether through amnesties or knife-arch metal detectors, is a form of removing the crime facilitator, and we return to anti-knife crime efforts later.
There are many documented examples of different types of property and violent crime prevented by situational crime prevention efforts, some of which are listed in Table 1.
Table 1: Examples of successful situational crime prevention projects
Responsible drinking practices in Australia
Street closures to prevent drive-by shootings in Los Angeles
Video cameras in housing for retired persons
Anti-cloning measures for U.S. cell phones
Alley gates to reduce burglaries in Liverpool
Airline baggage and passenger screening
Cash reduction in U.S. convenience stores
Anti-robbery screens in London post offices
Automated checking of income by applicants for housing subsidies in Sweden
Systematic cleaning of graffiti on New York City subway cars
Electronic and ink tag on merchandise in U.S. clothing stores
Speed cameras and random breath tests in Australia
Exact change and drop safes on U.S. buses to prevent robbery of bus drivers
Safes with time locks to prevent betting shop robberies in Australia
Removal of gas and electric coin meters from council houses in England to prevent burglary
Source: Clarke (2018).
The specificity of the examples in Table 1 capture the nature of many crime and context-dependent situational crime prevention efforts. That is, different interventions are typically needed for different crime types in different contexts. In addition to property and violent crime, numerous situational prevention efforts have been adopted for the prevention of cybercrime, as evidenced by a recent systematic review (Ho et al. 2023).
The flagship example of effective situational interventions is the international crime drop. In recent decades, security improvements have reduced many types of crime. Vehicle security improvements, particularly the electronic vehicle immobiliser, have not only largely eliminated joyriding and other temporary theft but have also significantly reduced professional and organised car theft (which now requires planning, specialist skill and equipment plus reliable contacts for vehicle disposal).Household burglary has been reduced by gradual and seemingly mundane improvements to the quality and quantity of door and window security fixtures and fittings. As a result of these high-volume crimes being reduced, young offenders were less involved in crime with fewer graduating to violent crime. In England & Wales, car theft, burglary and violence fell by close to 90 percent between the early to mid-1990s and 2023 (Figure 1).
Figure 1: The crime drop in England and Wales by 2023 (Source: CSEW; ONS (2024a). Violence, domestic burglary and vehicle-related theft incidence rates each indexed to its peak year)
Guns are more deadly than knives, and gun control is an example of effective weapon control. It fits with the situational crime prevention framework outlined above. England & Wales has significant gun control compared to the United States. The rate of gun-related homicide in the US is 44 times that of the UK for all gun homicides, and 54 times that of the UK for homicides using handguns (Table 2). While the non-gun US homicide rate is also higher, it is fractionally so in comparison, and may reflect the normalisation of violence enshrined in US gun control laws.
Table 2: Comparison of gun and non-gun homicides in England and Wales and in the United States 2009-2013
Number of homicides
Annual rate (per 1 million population)
Ratio
Type of murder
England & Wales
United States
England & Wales
United States
England & Wales: United States
All gun
205
50190
0.73
32.22
1: 44.0
Handgun
118
35362
0.42
22.70
1: 53.9
Non-gun
2584
23644
9.64
15.19
1: 1.6
Total
2907
73834
10.37
47.41
1: 4.6
(Source: Clarke 2018 based on data from Home Office and Office for National Statistics for England and Wales, and Federal Bureau of Investigation for United States).
A common criticism of efforts to reduce crime opportunities is that offenders displace to commit the same crime by other means. There is extensive research on crime displacement showing that prevented crime typically does not result in displacement, or may do so to a limited extent in the aggregate (Guerette & Bowers 2009). In the context of knife crime, if the availability of a particular type of dangerous knife is reduced then the likely criticism is that offenders will use a different type of knife or another weapon. We address this later.
EXTENT AND NATURE OF KNIFE CRIME
Extent
The most reliable source of information on the extent and trends in many crime types is usually the Crime Survey for England and Wales. This is a methodologically rigorous survey that asks a sample of around 30,000 people annually about their experiences of crime. However, knife crime is fortunately rare, such that the CSEW is unable to produce statistically reliable trends. While this indicates the comparatively low prevalence of knife crime, it requires other sources to identify trends.
Three sources from which trends in knife crime can be derived are police recorded crimes, hospital records, and homicide data. Each has their strengths and weaknesses. Not all knife crime is reported to the police. Only some of the more serious offences will result in a hospital admission linked to a knife crime. Homicides are only a small part of the overall picture of knife crime.
The main trend in knife crime indicated by each of these sources is similar. From a relatively low in 2012-13, knife crime increased through the 2010s to peak between 2017 and 2019 and has since been mostly in decline (Figure 1). The similarity in the trends from the different sources adds credibility and suggests that the trends may broadly represent what has happened. There were around 50,000 knife crime offences recorded by police in the financial year 2022/3, and, of the three offences, recorded crimes evidenced the largest proportional increase over the last decade.
Figure 2: Knife crime trends for three indicators
The number of knife crimes began to decline before the covid-19 pandemic. That decline was more pronounced during the pandemic, with evidence of a resurgence in 2022 as restrictions were removed, consistent with trends in many other crime types (Seyidoglu et al. 2024). Two of the three indicators show a decline for the most recent year of 2022/3 compared to the preceding year (Figure 1).
The most prevalent crime types involving knives are assaults[1]
Figure 3: Crime types involving knives. (Source: ONS 2024b).
Knife-related homicide
Knives or sharp instruments have long been the most prevalent means of committing homicide in England and Wales (Figure 4). This suggests knives would be an appropriate strategic national priority for homicide prevention efforts.[2] The increase in knife-related homicides in the 2010s, along with the broad category of ‘all other methods’ accounted for the bulk of the increase in homicides over that decade. Note that the 89 asphyxiated victims of the Hillsborough disaster were included in the 2016-17 homicide statistics and account for the apparent anomalous increase in the ‘strangulation or asphyxiation’ category in that year.
Figure 4: Means of homicide in England and Wales (Source: ONS 2024[3])
Since 2022 the Office for National Statistics has made available information on the type of knife used in homicides. The type of knife used was known and recorded for the majority of knife-related homicides (192 of 233). For homicides where the type of knife used was known, by far the most prevalent was kitchen knives (Figure 5), the next most prevalent being ‘other knife’ which does not fall into any of the remaining categories. While zombie and hunting knives appear to dominate much of the public discussion, they each account for between two and four percent of knife-related homicides. If the eight categories - zombie, hunting, combat/Rambo/military style, flick and lock knives plus machetes, swords and axes, are combined, they account for a quarter of knife-related homicides.
Figure 5: Type of knife or sharp instrument used in homicide in England & Wales 2022-23 (Source: ONS 2024)
Pointed-tip and Round-tip knives
Knives with points, whether straight-edge or serrated, have been shown to result in far more damage than knives with blunt tips. The effects upon humans were mimicked through testing the knives against different materials in pioneering work by Nichols-Drew and colleagues which is summarised in this section (Nichols-Drew 2019, Nichols-drew et al. 2020, Nichols-Drew 2023).
Five different types of knives were tested. It may seem unsurprising that the study found pointy knives to be by far the most damaging, but this is what evidence-based research is about. Without such basic evidence, critics would say that there is no proof that pointed-tip knives are the problem.
In a policy brief, Nichols-Drew (2023) make three recommendations. These are the promotion the use of rounded knives as safe alternatives to hazardous pointed knives, that governments form legislation to that end, and that there is engagement with knife manufacturers and retailers to create and supply rounded knives (Nichols-Drew 2023; 3). The present study locates these proposals in the context of theory, evidence and existing policy relating to crime prevention and knife-crime prevention, and in proposing a practical approach to policy adoption in a realistic timeframe.
Everyday control of lethal knives
Elsewhere it is argued that many crime prevention efforts are such a mundane part of everyday life that they are easy to overlook and sometimes taken for granted (Farrell & Tilley 2021). We suggest this is true in relation to lethal pointed-tip knives and suggest that they are widely restricted. Think about the last knife you used in a café, restaurant, or in your dining room. Dining knives usually have a rounded end. Why? The reason is that they are used frequently by everyone and would pose a major threat of violence if they were pointed. These are the majority of knives in everyday use, including by children, and account for the majority of knife usage. Yet the rounded end means they are not considered as viable weapons. While there are still a few pointed ‘steak’ knives they are, for the most part, specially distributed when needed and not generally available.
The dining fork has been suggested to be an earlier form of violence reduction (Elias 1934). For centuries before the fork, dining was a more dangerous activity because a dagger-like pointed knife was used to stab and raise food to the mouth.
PROPOSAL FOR PHASED REMOVAL OF LETHAL KNIVES
Recent policy developments relating to motor vehicles evidence the viability of the proposal outlined here to control knife crime. Only a few years ago, many readers would have scoffed at the suggestion that society could phase-out the internal combustion engine. It was largely unthinkable to tamper with an iconic, economically important, and integral component of everyday life. At the time of writing, increasing numbers of countries are phasing-out fossil-fuelled vehicles in favour of electronic vehicles, active travel, and public transportation (BBC 2020, International Energy Authority 2020). In the UK, sales of petrol and diesel engines will end by 2030, and all new cars and vans will have zero emissions by 2035 (Department for Transport 2020). This schedule gives manufacturers and consumers time to adapt.
The policy adopted for fossil-fuelled vehicles provides the model for our proposal relating to knife-crime. Indeed, the present proposal is modest in comparison. Drawing on this evidence, our policy proposal is a parallel phasing-out of pointed knives and a phasing-in of blunt-end knives for all culinary, domestic and other purposes.
Table 3: Phasing-out knife crime
Phase
Year
Activity
1.
2026-2030
Manufacturers develop safe knives for culinary and other uses. Marketing campaigns to promote knowledge, purchase and use of safe knives.
2
2031-2035
Depletion of stocks/sales of pointed-end knives; increased stock/sales of blunt-end knives. Subsidised grinding of lethal knives to make non-lethal.
3
2036-2040
Only safe knives on sale. Incentivised removal of dangerous knives from homes and workplaces.
4
2041 onwards
Ban on manufacturer, sale, possession and use of dangerous knives.
The process is here envisaged as having four stages across two decades. This preliminary proposal should be refined in consultation with interested parties. The phased approach is intended to allow markets and manufacturers time to adapt. It will take time to introduce non-lethal knife designs into production processes and to deplete the manufacture of lethal knives. It will take time to exhaust existing stocks.
Enterprising manufacturers should quickly identify the opportunity that this proposal represents. Government will need to consider whether any aspects need to be subsidised or incentivised. It may be that kitchen knife purchases represent a sufficient small proportion of disposable income that subsidies are not required in most circumstances. Consideration should be given to subsidised grinding of existing knives so that businesses can keep knives where there has been significant investment, and so that individuals can keep treasured knife sets. Consideration may need be given to certified exemptions that exceed a requirement threshold and justify ownership of a lethal knife.
International trade agreements will need to be reconciled as standards change in England and Wales. There are likely to be few professions where a lethal knife is required to complete a task, and these should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Policy change is probably best framed as improvement to health and safety measures, similar to those for a wide range of products where safety standards have been introduced to reduce risk to life and limb. These things take time.
The specifics of the schedule shown in Table 1 can be refined as required. The primary notion is that of shaping behaviour gradually and allowing time for changes to take place without significant disruption to markets.
Safe and practical non-lethal kitchen knives
Round-end kitchen knives are already on the market. The Offensive Weapons Act 2019, which classified kitchen knives as an offensive weapon, is cited by one manufacturer as instigating their manufacture of a range of ‘safety first’ kitchen knives (Figure 6).[4] The manufacture reports “a new generation of kitchen knife that has safety front of mind, yet still answers everyday food preparation needs.” (Viners 2019). The knife set was developed in consultation with 1700 consumers “who shared their thoughts on the functionality and aesthetics” of knives designs “eliminating the tip of the knife to make it safer to use without compromising on performance.” (Viners 2019).
Figure 6: A set of safe kitchen knives (Source: Viners[5]
The possibility of displacement
The issue of displacement was touched on in the review of theory and evidence earlier in this study. Both theory and evidence indicate that when crime is prevented, displacement often does not occur or may occur to a limited extent. Nevertheless, we anticipate that displacement will be raised as a criticism of the present proposal. This section focuses on the possibility of displacement if lethal kitchen knives were controlled, particularly the possibility of a tactical switch to another sharp instrument or other weapon.
Much knife crime relates to knife carrying. We suggest the carrying of other weapons is less likely overall if lethal knives are removed from the equation. ‘Status knife’ is the term capturing how a key issue is the psychological reward from peers of carrying some types of knife: the carrier may derive some kudos from peers and be able to threaten others. Kitchen knives may be less likely to be status knives than some of the more ornate zombie or other knives, but let us consider the possibility that being armed brings the status. Of these lethal knives are removed, what other weapon might be a good substitute? Perhaps a bicycle chain could be carried as a weapon, except it is less readily available, harder to wield as a weapon, and less injurious on average. The status from carrying a chain is reduced, and therefore, we suggest, would be the temptation to carry. Most other objects are inferior either as status weapons or when used as weapons. Some of the potential substitutes are discussed further below.
What about ‘tinder-box’ violence occurring the home? If lethal kitchen knives are not available, what is the next-best alternative? Scissors or screwdrivers are a possibility. Many scissors are already rounded rather than pointed. Further, the design of scissors makes them unwieldy for the purpose of stabbing. The default use of scissors involves the fingers being threated through the scissor handles, and using them to threaten or stab offers an uncomfortable grasp. Scissors are also less numerous than kitchen knives and less likely to be on open display (compared to, say, a box set of knives) and typically less readily available (compared to a drawer with knives). The reason that scissors do not already feature prominently in knife crime statistics is that they are a significantly inferior weapon.
Another contender is a screwdriver. However, screwdrivers also do not comprise a large component of existing knife crime statistics for a reason. They are not as readily to hand as knives in a kitchen or other domestic setting - aside from perhaps a toolshed. They are significantly inferior as ‘status’ weapons, arguably indicating the inability of the carrier to find a ‘proper’ status weapon.
Broken glass bottles are a potential alternative weapon. However, plastic, cardboard or aluminium cans are often more numerous as containers in the home. Where glass bottles are used, they are now typically disposed of into a recycling container wen empty. Some glass bottles are not suitable as weapons – they may be too fragile, for instance. A perfume bottle is unlikely to be an optimal weapon. Even some beers bottles are too large or too small. For the most part, use as weapon will require a size within a particular range and for the bottle to be made of sufficiently strong glass and of a design that affords usage as a weapon. They also require a user to recognise the potential of a bottle as a weapon which cannot be assumed. Further, operationalising a bottle as a weapon requires skill to avoid completely breaking the bottle and potentially damaging the offender.
It is not obvious if other kitchen items will serve. Most require more effort or skill to utilise in a lethal fashion. Whisks and spatulas appear humorously inappropriate. What about other household items? Perhaps a pencil could be a lethal stabbing weapon, but it is structurally weaker and likely to do far less damage than a pointed kitchen knife. Some garden tools – secateurs and such – are potentially dangerous. On average though, it will require more time and effort to access them from the shed, garage or other location, giving the offender cooling-off time and the potential victim time to escape. Generally, garden-based weapons are a poor and unlikely substitute if lethal kitchen knives are unavailable.
What about blunt objects and other potential weapons? Heavy ornaments or rocks from the garden are potential weapons, but take time and effort to acquire and are wielded with difficulty. Books and remote controls may be available but are insufficiently dangerous for the most part. For most other items their consideration quickly lapses into the ridiculous.
This discussion is consistent with the existing theory and evidence relating to crime displacement. For the most part it is scarce. It may occur in some instances but in the aggregate there is a significant net reduction in crime. The evidence for the fact that other items are inferior is the fact that they are not already the first choice: lethal kitchen knives are the weapon of choice for homicide in England and Wales for a reason.
The diffusion of benefits
A ‘diffusion of benefits’ effect is framed as the opposite of displacement (Guerette & Bowers 2009). Numerous evaluations have found that crime prevention effects extend beyond the initial scope, or that an anticipatory benefit is incurred before a policy is introduced (Smith et al. 2022). We suggest that both types of diffusion may occur. If customers and manufacturers anticipate legislative change then behaviour relating to and use of lethal knives may change in advance. Similarly, an impending ban on lethal knives may cause a broader effect upon violence and other types of crime. We would not only expect a reduction in homicides but also other knife-related crime types. Previous research suggests that reducing crime opportunities for young people reduces their involvement in crime which in turn reduces the size of cohorts progressing to habitual involvement in crime (Dixon and Farrell 2020), and we would not rule out this type of broader effect if the most prominent type of weapon was removed.
In this context, lethal knives are also a cause of many avoidable injuries in kitchens and elsewhere. Knive-related injuries account for over 10% of major injuries reported to the government’s Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and 58% of all work-related accidents involving manual tools (British Safe Industry Federation 2021). The HSE report the following example
“While trying to open a 25 kilo bag of potatoes, the commis chef sliced the corner of the bag using a 12-inch fish filleting knife. With the knife still in his right hand pointing upwards, he then attempted to move the bag. The cut section of bag gave way causing the knife to be thrust upwards into his face, causing a severe laceration.” (at https://www.hse.gov.uk/catering/knives.htm )
A significant beneficial diffusionary aspect of safe knives would be reduced injurious ‘accidents’ in restaurants, in homes and elsewhere, in addition to reducing knife crime.
Discussion of the study’s contribution
Knife crime is a significant problem. It has been a dominant feature of news media and political discussions about crime in England and Wales in recent years, and knives are the most prevalent murder weapon. Existing efforts to reduce knife crime have met with limited success. In that context this study is ambitious in proposing a policy change and schedule to reduce knife crime. It details the mechanisms by which knife crime will be reduced with little or no displacement, and suggests other forms of crime and criminality may also decline as a positive knock-on effect (a diffusion of preventive benefits). While the focus is England & Wales, there are significant implications for other countries which, depending on the nature of their knife crime problem, may wish to consider adopting this approach.
Central to the study is an original proposal. It is novel in the emphasis upon lethal knives in everyday life which contrasts with most media and policy debate centred on zombie and other ‘status’ knives or on gangs and young people. To do this, the study was underpinned by evidence of the dominant role of kitchen knives in homicide, in the context of extensive theory and evidence on the effectiveness of reducing crime opportunities. Few readers, we suggest, will have previously recognised the important crime prevention role of rounded-end dining room knives.
The proposal outlined here would affect the lives of most householders and some businesses in England and Wales. Extensive justification such a policy change is required. The study offered rigorous coverage of the theoretical and empirical evidence underpinning the proposal, detail of the mechanisms by which the policy would work, explanation of why little or no displacement would be expected and why, in contrast, a diffusion of benefits would be highly likely, particularly as non-criminal ‘accidental’ knife injuries declined across the country.
CONCLUSION
Knives are the most prevalent weapon used in homicides in England and Wales. Lethal kitchen knives are the weapon of choice in more than half of murders. The sharp tip of kitchen knives is unnecessary for culinary purposes: it is possible to julienne a carrot without a lethal weapon. Safe kitchen knife designs already exist and are in production, and safe round-tip knives are the default in dining rooms to the extent that we barely notice their crime prevention role. Extensive theory and evidence supports the proposal, and fossil-fuel motor vehicles offer a high-profile precent to a phased approach. The proposal will, we suggest, reduce homicide by half in England and Wales, reduce other crimes in proportion to the use of lethal kitchen knives, potentially reduce other crime types, and will dramatically reduce non-criminal knife-related injuries.
British Safety Industry Federation. 2021. Cutting out knife injuries, at https://www.bsif.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Cut-Campaign.pdf
Bullock, K., Agar, I., Ashby, M., Brennan, I., Hales, G., Sidebottom, A. & Tilley, N. 2023.. Police practitioner views on the challenges of analysing and responding to knife crime. Crime Science 12, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-022-00180-1
Clarke, R.V. 2018. The theory and practice of situational crime prevention, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.327
Clarke R.V. & D. B. Cornish. 1985. ‘Modelling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy’ in M. Tonry (Ed.) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, volume 6, Chicago: university of Chicago Press. (pp. 147-185)
Culley, J. & H, Khalil. 2024. Southport stabbings – what we know about attacks. BBC News, 29 July 2024 (updated 31 July 2024), at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy68z9dw9e7o accessed 14 October 2024.
Dehghanniri, H. and H. Borrion. 2021. Crime scripting: A systematic review. European Journal of Criminology, 18, 4, 504-525.
Dixon, A. & G. Farrell. 2020. Age-period-cohort effects for half a century of motor vehicle theft in the United States, Crime Science, 9(11); 1-17.
Elias, N. 1934. The Civilising Process (2nd edtion, 2000: Wiley-Blackwell).
Farrell, G. and N. Tilley. (2022). Elegant security: Concept, evidence and implications. European Journal of Criminology, 19(5); 932-953.
Gardham, D. 2020. Reading is latest in seven years of terrorist knife attacks in the UK, The Guardian, 21 June 2020, at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/21/seven-years-of-terrorist-knife-attacks-in-the-uk accessed 19 September 2024.
Guerette, R.T., & K. J. Bowers. 2009. ‘Assessing the extent of crime displacement and diffusion of benefits: A review of situational crime prevention evaluations.’ Criminology 47(4):1331–68.
Ho, H., R. Ko & L. Mazerolle. 2022. Situational Crime Prevention (SCP) techniques to control cybercrime: A focused systematic review, Computers & Security, 115, 102611; 1-24.
Home Office. 2022. Violence Reduction Unit year ending March 2021 evaluation report. London: Home Office
Home Office. 2023. Violence Reduction Units 2022 to 2023, 20 December 2023, at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/violence-reduction-units-year-ending-march-2023-evaluation-report/violence-reduction-units-2022-to-2023
Home Office. 2024. Sale of knives: Voluntary agreement by retailers. 10 July 2024, at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sale-of-knives-voluntary-agreement-by-retailers/sale-of-knives-voluntary-agreement-by-retailers
Leclcerc, B. 2016. Crime scripts. in R. Wortley and M.Townsley (Eds). Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis. Abingdon: Willan. (pp. 119-141)
Nevett, J. 2024. Labour on a mission to halve knife crime , Cooper says. BBC News, 24 September, at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3e9vv3jzzxo
Nichols-Drew, L. 2019. Researching international forensic science responses in Australia and Canada to aid the UK knife crime response. Winston Churchill Memorial Trust.
Nichols-Drew, L., R. Armitage, R. Hillman, K.J. Sheridan & K.J. Farrugia. 2020. On a knife edge: A preliminary investigation of clothing damage using rounded-tip knives, Science & Justice, 60; 496-503.
Nichols-Drew, L. 2023. Rounded knives campaign would help save the lives of many around world, Policy brief 2023,
Office for National Statistics. 2024. Appendix tables: homicide in England and Wales, 08 February 2024, at https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/appendixtableshomicideinenglandandwales
Seyidoglu, H., G.Farrell, A. Dixon, J. Pina-Sanchez and N. Malleson. 2024. Post-pandemic crime trends in England and Wales, Crime Science, 13(6): 1-11.
Sidebottom A, Brennan I, Agar I, Ashby M, Bullock K, Hales G and Tilley N. (2021). ‘Knife crime: A problem solving guide’. College of Policing.
Smith, M., R.V. Clarke & K. Pease. 2002. Anticipatory benefits in crime prevention, Crime Prevention Studies, 13; 71-88.
Viners. 2019. Viners to launch new safety kitchen knives, at https://www.viners.co.uk/blog/viners-to-launch-new-safety-kitchen-knives
Notes
[1] The ONS definition of assaults is ‘assault with injury and assault with intent to cause serious harm’ in worksheet 22 of ONS (2024).
[2] The years run from February to March so that 2016, for example, refers to the year March 2016 to February 2017 inclusive. The category of ‘strangled or asphyxiated’ in the year 2016-17 included victims of the 1989 Hillsborough disaster.
[4] Lethal kitchen knives cause avoidable accidents as well as crime, as indicated in this example used by the UK government’s Health and Safety Executive: “While trying to open a 25 kilo bag of potatoes, the commis chef sliced the corner of the bag using a 12-inch fish filleting knife. With the knife still in his right hand pointing upwards, he then attempted to move the bag. The cut section of bag gave way causing the knife to be thrust upwards into his face, causing a severe laceration.” at https://www.hse.gov.uk/catering/knives.htm
Hello, as a newbie to cryptocurrency trading, I lost a lot of money trying to navigate the market on my own, then in my search for a genuine and trusted trader/broker, i came across Trader Bernie Doran who guided and helped me retrieve my lost cryptocurrencies and I made so much profit up to the tune of $60,000. I made my first investment with $2,000 and got a ROI profit of $25,000 in less than 2 week. You can contact this expert trader Mr Bernie Doran via Gmail : BERNIEDORANSIGNALS@ GMAIL. COM and be ready to share your experience, tell him I referred you